1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 32 Wis.2d
  5. 32 Wis.2d 523 (1966)
 

OSEMAN v. STATE

32 Wis.2d 523 (1966)

OSEMAN, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 1, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Malloy & Mayew of Kenosha, and oral argument by John E. Malloy.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general.

HANLEY, J.

Three issues are presented in the writ of error. First, was repeated testimony which informed the jury that one Marcel Dupree who was seen leaving the burglarized tavern and the defendant were friends irrelevant and prejudicial? Second, did the trial court err in refusing to grant a mistrial based on the fact that three members of the jury had read an account of the case while the trial was in progress which informed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases