1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 242 Md.
  5. 242 Md. 307 (1966)
 

BOLLINGER v. BOLLINGER

[No. 278, September Term, 1965.]

242 Md. 307 (1966)

219 A.2d 62

BOLLINGER v. BOLLINGER, ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 26, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald C. Sponseller, with whom were Stanford Hoff and Sponseller & Hoff on the brief, for appellant.

No brief and no appearance for appellees.

The cause was argued before PRESCOTT, C.J., and HAMMOND, MARBURY and McWILLIAMS, JJ., and CARTER, J., Chief Judge of the Second Judicial Circuit, specially assigned.

McWILLIAMS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The late Ring Lardner, were he writing this opinion, might have begun it by saying that although the Bollinger boys were not very congenial brothers they were not very congenial partners either. George (appellant) is the youngest. Stanley is the oldest and Francis fits somewhere in between. They are the appellees. The three brothers have spent their lives in the vicinity of Westminster, where, until 1958, they farmed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases