1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 373 F.2d
  5. 373 F.2d 159 (1966)
 

LARCHFIELD CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES

No. 18, Docket 30068.

373 F.2d 159 (1966)

LARCHFIELD CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided December 20, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murray I. Gurfein, New York City (Goldstein, Judd & Gurfein, New York City) (Silverson, Gelberg & Kronovet, New York City) (Saul Duff Kronovet, Ronald Dreier, William J. Howard, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Edward Heilbronner, Alexandria, Va. (Richard M. Roberts, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Melva M. Graney, Attys., Washington, D. C.) Jon O. Newman, U. S. Atty., John F. Mulcahy, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel), for appellee.

Before FRIENDLY, SMITH and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiff, Larchfield Corporation, is the successor in interest to two corporations both known as The Aspinook Corporation. The older of these ("Old Aspinook") was organized in 1938; the younger ("New Aspinook") was a consolidation, effectuated December 18, 1948, of Old Aspinook and two 50% owned subsidiaries, The Lawrence Print Works, Inc. and Arnold Print Works, Inc., pursuant to the settlement of a stockholders' derivative action in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases