1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 243 Cal.App.2d
  5. 243 Cal.App.2d 284 (1966)
 

PEOPLE v. CLINTON

Docket No. 11453.

243 Cal.App.2d 284 (1966)

52 Cal. Rptr. 221

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BERNARD CLINTON, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

June 29, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard Clinton, in pro. per., and Glory D. Coffey, under appointment by the District Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Howard J. Bechefsky, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

FILES, P.J.

[1a] The question presented is whether multiple sentencing, in violation of Penal Code section 654, may be corrected, long after the judgment has become final, upon motion made in the court which pronounced judgment. Our conclusion is that the sentencing court has no continuing jurisdiction for this purpose.

The record shows that, after a jury trial, defendant was convicted in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County on three counts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases