1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 260 F.Supp.
  5. 260 F.Supp. 221 (1966)
 

ALUMINUM EXTRUSION COMPANY v. SOULE STEEL COMPANY

No. 65-1423-IH.

260 F.Supp. 221 (1966)

ALUMINUM EXTRUSION COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. SOULE STEEL COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court C. D. California.

October 27, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mahoney & Hornbaker, Thomas P. Mahoney & Robert D. Hornbaker, Santa Monica, Cal., for plaintiff.

Townsend & Townsend, San Francisco, Cal., Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HILL, District Judge.

In this action, Plaintiff, Aluminum Extrusion Company, claims that Defendant, Soule Steel Company, infringed a patent for a type of window construction and seeks damages and an injunction against future infringement.

Defendant now moves under Civil Rule 56 for summary judgment. The affidavits filed in support of the motion disclose that there is no genuine issue as to any material...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases