1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 243 Md.
  5. 243 Md. 224 (1966)
 

BUCKEYE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. BROWN & SHILLING, INC.

[No. 339, September Term, 1965.]

243 Md. 224 (1966)

220 A.2d 922

THE BUCKEYE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. BROWN & SHILLING, INC. ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 23, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Isidor Roman, with whom was Robert Eugene Smith on the brief, for the appellant.

Harris James George, with whom were R. Taylor McLean and Royston, Mueller, Thomas & McLean on the brief, for Brown & Shilling, Inc., and other interested parties to the sale, part of the appellees.

Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, and Thomas P. Perkins, III, Assistant Attorney General, on the brief for the Sheriff of Baltimore County, who conducted the sale, the other appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, HORNEY, OPPENHEIMER, BARNES and McWILLIAMS, JJ.

McWILLIAMS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal arises out of a quarrel between Brown & Shilling, Inc., an appellee (Brown), and The Buckeye Development Corporation, appellant (Buckeye). A story (long and wearisome) goes with it but, fortunately for us and those obliged to read this opinion, to dispose of it we need to deal with but a single chapter.

Brown is trying to collect from Buckeye $9,518...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases