1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 243 Md.
  5. 243 Md. 218 (1966)
 

APPEL v. STATE

[No. 465, September Term, 1965.]

243 Md. 218 (1966)

220 A.2d 301

APPEL v. STATE OF NEW YORK

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Opinion filed June 22, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Heeney, with whom were William J. Rowan, III and Heeney, McAuliffe & McAuliffe on the brief, for appellant.

David T. Mason, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, and Leonard T. Kardy, State's Attorney for Montgomery County, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before PRESCOTT, C.J., HORNEY, MARBURY, OPPENHEIMER and BARNES, JJ.

Decided, per curiam, May 26, 1966.

PER CURIAM ORDER:

For the reasons to be hereafter stated, it is ORDERED, this 26th day of May, 1966, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the order passed herein by the court below be affirmed; but, since it requires the appellant to appear in New York on dates which have now expired, the case is remanded so that the Circuit Court may modify its order to include dates satisfactory to the New York authorities...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases