1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 249 F.Supp.
  5. 249 F.Supp. 210 (1966)
 

HUDIE v. ALIQUIPPA & SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 65-949.

249 F.Supp. 210 (1966)

Donald HUDIE, Thomas Lavelle, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Local Lodge No. 1053, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALIQUIPPA & SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

January 7, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert D. Brandon, of Brandon, Shearer & Flaherty, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.

J. N. Poffinberger, Jr., of Kirkpatrick, Pomeroy, Lockhart & Johnson, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

MARSH, District Judge.

In the Substituted Complaint Hudie and other conductor-brakemen of the Aliquippa & Southern Railroad Company, and Local Lodge 1053 of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, the certified bargaining agent of all train service employees of that Railroad, seek an injunction requiring the defendant carrier to comply in all respects with Article I, Section (c) of the Collective Bargaining Agreement ("Contract") between Local 1053 of the Brotherhood...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases