1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 420 Pa.
  5. 420 Pa. 23 (1966)
 

COM. ex rel. ENSOR v. CUMMINGS

420 Pa. 23 (1966)

Commonwealth ex rel. Ensor, Appellant, v. Cummings.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 4, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin Vinikoor, with him Stanford Shmukler, and Vinikoor, Fein, Criden and Johanson, for appellant.

Daniel W. Shoemaker, District Attorney, for appellees.

Before BELL, C.J., MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE EAGEN, January 4, 1966:

This is a habeas corpus proceeding which we heretofore remanded for further hearing. See, Commonwealth ex rel. Ensor v. Cummings, 416 Pa. 510, 207 A.2d 230 (1965).

Appellant attacks the legality of her conviction and sentence for criminal abortion. The history of the case is detailed in our previous opinion and need not be repeated here. The main issue involved is the admissibility...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases