1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 46 N.J.
  5. 46 N.J. 340 (1966)
 

SELLERS v. PHILIP'S BARBER SHOP

46 N.J. 340 (1966)

217 A.2d 121

THOMAS PEYTON SELLERS, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. PHILIP'S BARBER SHOP AND PHILIP GATTI, OWNER, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. REGINALD BARROW, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. PHILIP GATTI, T/A PHILIP'S BARBER SHOP, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 21, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Albert F. Dalena and Paul Colvin argued the cause for respondent-appellant (Mr. Albert F. Dalena, attorney; Messrs. Dalena, Colvin and Joseph D. McGlone, of counsel).

Mr. Joseph A. Hoffman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent, State of New Jersey (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney, Mr. Hoffman, of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.

Philip Gatti, trading as Philip's Barber Shop, owns and operates a barber shop in Madison, N.J. He and his shop are licensed under N.J.S.A. 45:4-27 et seq. He has been barbering for over 25 years. Thomas Peyton Sellers and Reginald Barrow are residents of that borough. On April 23, 1964, Sellers entered Gatti's shop to obtain a haircut. Barrow went there on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases