1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 243 Or.
  5. 243 Or. 138 (1966)
 

STATE v. ALTIG

243 Or. 138 (1966)

412 P.2d 25

STATE OF OREGON v. ALTIG

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reargued February 1, 1966.

Affirmed March 16, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis F. Yunker, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

Lewis B. Hampton, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause, and George M. Joseph, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, reargued the cause for respondent. With them on the briefs was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, GOODWIN, DENECKE, HOLMAN and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

Defendant was convicted of violating ORS 165.0301 and appeals. The indictment alleged that the defendant, as an agent entrusted with the money of another, unlawfully and feloniously, with intent to defraud, converted the money to her own use.

1. The issue is whether the evidence was sufficient to justify the submission of the case to the jury. In considering this question, we examine the entire record...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases