1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 263 F.Supp.
  5. 263 F.Supp. 101 (1966)
 

POLYCHROME CORPORATION v. MINNESOTA MIN. & MFG. CO.

No. 66 Civ. 979.

263 F.Supp. 101 (1966)

POLYCHROME CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

December 16, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, for plaintiff, Edward N. Costikyan, Thomas R. Farrell, Jr., Sidney S. Rosdeitcher, New York City, of counsel.

Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City, for defendant, John R. Schoemer, Jr., and Philip D. Pakula, New York City, Chadwell, Keck, Kayser, Ruggles & McLaren, John T. Chadwell, Glenn W. McGee, Chicago, Ill., of counsel.

MEMORANDUM

BONSAL, District Judge.

Defendant Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M) moves pursuant to Rule 12(f), F.R.Civ.P., to strike paragraph 15 of the plaintiff's amended complaint as an improper reference to a plea of nolo contendere and to a judgment entered thereon. In paragraph 15 plaintiff alleges that:

"In United States v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company [249 F.Supp. 594

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases