MATTER OF KOHL v. PICOULT


18 N.Y.2d 312 (1966)

In the Matter of the Claim of Maurice Kohl, Respondent, v. Jack Picoult, Appellant-Respondent; Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Co., Respondent, and Michigan Mutual Insurance Co., Appellant. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 25, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard F. Farley and F. T. Esposito for appellant.

Lawrence Feldman and Nathan Rosen for Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Company, respondent.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Harry Rackow, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING concur.


MEMORANDUM.

Claimant's employment, although physically in Minnesota, has been found upon an adequate record to have been so closely related to New York as to be governed by the New York Workmen's Compensation Law and within the jurisdiction of the New York board. This result is not questioned on the present appeal. The controversy is between Michigan Mutual Insurance Co., which covered the employer under "the workmen's compensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases