1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 101 Ariz.
  5. 101 Ariz. 208 (1966)
 

REVELS v. POHLE

No. 7511.

101 Ariz. 208 (1966)

418 P.2d 364

Betty Jo REVELS and Millard Revels, her husband, Appellants, v. Dr. Ernest E. POHLE, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arizona. In Division.

September 28, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hash & Bernstein, by V.L. Hash, Phoenix, for appellants.

O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears, by Robert W. Browder, Phoenix, for appellee.

UDALL, Justice.

Millard and Betty Jo Revels, the plaintiffs, brought suit against the defendant, Ernest E. Pohle, to recover damages for alleged malpractice by defendant upon the person of Betty Jo Revels. The alleged malpractice is based upon the postoperative care of plaintiff after a hysterectomy operation. The case was tried before a jury and, at the close of the evidence for plaintiffs, the court granted a motion for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases