1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 93 N.J.
  5. 93 N.J. Super. 215 (1966)
 

CARROLL v. HOUTZ

93 N.J. Super. 215 (1966)

225 A.2d 584

ELIZABETH CARROLL, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM M. CARROLL, AND ELIZABETH CARROLL, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM M. CARROLL, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEVINE HOUTZ AND KOFMAN'S, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 28, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Morris Brown argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman and Spitzer, attorneys).

Mr. Charles V. Webb, Jr., argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Gaffey, Webb and McDermott, attorneys; Mr. Webb and Mr. Louis Ruprecht on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and LABRECQUE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LABRECQUE, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Elizabeth Carroll, as administratrix and administratrix ad prosequendum of her deceased husband, William M. Carroll, appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants, based upon a jury verdict of no cause for action.

Decedent's death followed a collision between a vehicle driven by him and a tractor-trailer owned by defendant Kofman's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases