1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 254 F.Supp.
  5. 254 F.Supp. 39 (1966)
 

FREEMAN v. BRENNER

Civ. A. No. 1079-64.

254 F.Supp. 39 (1966)

Stephen E. FREEMAN, Gordon W. Gottschalk, and Freeman Chemical Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Edward J. BRENNER, Commissioner of Patents, Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

April 5, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman M. Shapiro, Owen J. Murray, Jr., Merriam, Marshall, Shapiro & Klose, Chicago, Ill., Joseph A. DeGrandi, Browne, Schuyler & Beveridge, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

Joseph Schimmel, Sol., U. S. Patent Office, Washington, D. C., Raymond E. Martin, Washington, D. C., of counsel, for defendant.

JACKSON, District Judge.

This is a civil action under 35 U.S.C. § 145 in which plaintiffs seek to obtain a patent for their invention of using acid catalyzed thermosetting furfuryl alcohol resins as binding agents in foundry sand cores used in the casting of molten metals. Upon review of all the evidence, old and new, in the case, as well as the briefs of counsel, the Court finds for the defendant and against plaintiffs, who are not entitled to a patent on the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases