1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 100 Ariz.
  5. 100 Ariz. 174 (1966)
 

RUTLEDGE v. STATE

No. 8483.

100 Ariz. 174 (1966)

412 P.2d 467

William L. RUTLEDGE and Velora A. Rutledge, husband and wife, Appellants, v. The STATE of Arizona, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

Rehearing Denied April 19, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dunseath, Stubbs & Burch, Tucson, for appellants.

Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen., Robert W. Pickrell, former Atty. Gen., Stanley Z. Goodfarb, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for appellee.

McFARLAND, Justice:

William L. Rutledge and Velora A. Rutledge, appellants, hereinafter designated plaintiffs, filed a complaint in inverse eminent domain seeking compensation for loss of access to their land in Superior Court, Pima County, against the State of Arizona on November 26, 1962. Plaintiffs appeal from the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of the state.

Plaintiffs are the owners of Lot 14, Block 9, Sunset Villa Addition, Tucson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases