1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 243 Or.
  5. 243 Or. 27 (1966)
 

JAQUITH v. HARTLEY

243 Or. 27 (1966)

411 P.2d 274

JAQUITH ET UX v. HARTLEY ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed with directions February 24, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steve Anderson and Allan G. Carson, Salem, argued the cause for appellants. With Mr. Anderson on the briefs were Carson, Carson & Carson, Salem.

Gary D. Gortmaker, District Attorney, Salem, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, GOODWIN, DENECKE and SCHWAB, Justices.

REVERSED WITH DIRECTIONS.

DENECKE, J.

The plaintiffs' land was foreclosed by the county because of delinquent taxes. The statutory right of redemption was not exercised (ORS 312.120), and on February 9, 1961, the county acquired fee simple title to the property pursuant to ORS 312.200. At that time all rights of redemption were terminated by operation of statute. The county subsequently withdrew the foreclosed property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases