1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 144 N.W.2d
  5. 144 N.W.2d 42 (1966)
 

CITY OF WATERTOWN v. MESEBERG

No. 10232.

144 N.W.2d 42 (1966)

CITY OF WATERTOWN, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Mae MESEBERG, Defendant and Appellant. CITY OF WATERTOWN, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Delores MESEBERG, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

July 15, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beardsley, Osheim & Wagner, Watertown, for appellants.

Dean Sumner, Watertown, for respondent.

RENTTO, Presiding Judge.

These defendants were charged with becoming barmaids in violation of an ordinance of the City of Watertown. Pursuant to stipulation the controversy was heard by the trial court, without a jury, on an agreed statement of facts. The court denied their motions to dismiss and found them guilty after which a fine of $25 was imposed on each of them. They appeal.

In their assignments of error they claim that the ordinance in question is ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases