1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 90 N.J.
  5. 90 N.J. Super. 61 (1966)
 

STATE v. TELEK

90 N.J. Super. 61 (1966)

216 A.2d 242

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LEHEL TELEK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 10, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. H. Frank Pettit argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Leslie P. Glick, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Leo Kaplowitz, Union County Prosecutor, attorney).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted in the County Court on four counts of embezzlement, one count of larceny and one count of conspiracy. Three of the embezzlement counts charged that defendant, being an employee of Merck & Co., Inc., did within certain specified periods "embezzle and, with intent to defraud, retain and appropriate for his own use certain written processes and procedures and papers, memoranda, records and reports, pertaining to" various pharmaceutical...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases