1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 358 F.2d
  5. 358 F.2d 1012 (1966)
 

APPLICATION OF KARP

Patent Appeal No. 7621.

358 F.2d 1012 (1966)

Application of Edward C. KARP.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

Rehearing Denied June 9, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Willard Hayes, Washington, D. C., James M. Wetzel, Richard G. Lione, Robert L. Harmon, Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D. C. (L. F. Parker, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before RICH, Acting Chief Judge, and MARTIN, SMITH, and ALMOND, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK.

ALMOND, Judge.

Edward C. Karp appeals from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the final rejection of claims 3, 4, 6 and 10 of appellant's application1 entitled "Indicating Device Index." No claims have been allowed.

The issue is whether the subject matter disclosed and claimed by appellant is obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of the following prior art:

  Hallwood (hereinafter
    Hallwood I) ...

                    
                    
                    

                        

                            

                                
                            

                            

                                

                                    
    
                                        
  1. 
                                        
  2. 
                                        
  3. 
                                    

                                

                                

                                    
Let's get started

                                

                                

                                    

                                    Leagle.com
                                    

                                    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting 
                                    

                                        Sign on now to see your case. 
                                        

                                        Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
                                        

                                        
    
                                            
  • Updated daily.
    • 
                                            
  • Uncompromising quality.
    • 
                                            
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.
    •

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases