1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 255 F.Supp.
  5. 255 F.Supp. 1020 (1966)
 

CHORE-TIME EQUIPMENT, INC. v. BIG DUTCHMAN, INC.

Civ. A. No. 4853.

255 F.Supp. 1020 (1966)

CHORE-TIME EQUIPMENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. BIG DUTCHMAN, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court W. D. Michigan, S. D.

Reconsideration Denied September 28, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wheeler, Upham, Bryant & Uhl, Grand Rapids, Mich.; Pepple, Yoder & Ainlay, Goshen, Ind.; Olson, Trexler, Wolters & Bushnell, Chicago, Ill.; George V. Boucher, Grand Rapids, Mich.; Frank E. Yoder, Goshen, Ind. and Richard Bushnell, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for plaintiff.

Price & Heneveld, Grand Rapids, Mich.; Warner, Norcross & Judd, Grand Rapids, Mich.; Lloyd A. Heneveld and Charles C. Lundstrom, Grand Rapids, Mich., of counsel, for defendant.

See 258 F.Supp. 196.

OPINION ON MOTION FOR PRODUCTION

FOX, District Judge.

The defendant, Big Dutchman, Inc., has made a motion in this patent infringement action, pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for the production of correspondence between the plaintiff and its attorneys concerning United States Patent Application Serial No. 59,312 and United States Patent Application Serial No. 307,274. The defendant claims the correspondence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases