1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 254 F.Supp.
  5. 254 F.Supp. 1003 (1966)
 

UNITED STATES v. STONEHILL

No. 64 Cr. 593.

254 F.Supp. 1003 (1966)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Harry S. STONEHILL, Ira Blaustein, Kai Hekker, Universal New York, Inc., and United States Tobacco Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

April 27, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for Southern Dist. of New York, New York City, for United States, Peter Fleming, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel.

Royall, Koegel & Rogers, New York City, for defendant Harry S. Stonehill, Wyllys S. Newcomb, Norman Ostrow, New York City, of counsel.

WEINFELD, District Judge.

The papers on this motion by defendant Stonehill leave no room to doubt that from December 1961 to March 3, 1962, when the first search warrants were issued and executed in Manila by the Philippine Government, representatives of the United States Government had received many papers and documents from Spielman who, whatever his motivation, had obtained them while serving as General Manager of the United States Tobacco Corporation in the Philippines...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases