1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 261 F.Supp.
  5. 261 F.Supp. 954 (1966)
 

OIL SHALE CORPORATION v. UDALL

Civ. A. Nos. 8680, 8685, 8691, 9202.

261 F.Supp. 954 (1966)

The OIL SHALE CORPORATION and Energy Resources Technology Land, Incorporated, Plaintiffs, v. Stewart L. UDALL, Secretary of the Interior, Defendant. Joseph B. UMPLEBY and Wasatch Development Co., Plaintiffs, v. Stewart L. UDALL, Secretary of the Interior, Defendant. Barnette T. NAPIER, Grace A. Savage, Joan L. Savage, Maude B. Farnum, St. Clair Napier Catlin, William H. Farnum, Jr., John R. Farnum, John W. Savage, and Neil S. Mincer, Plaintiffs, v. Stewart L. UDALL, Secretary of the Interior, Defendant. Penelope Chase BROWN, individually and as trustee, and the Oil Shale Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Stewart L. UDALL, Secretary of the Interior, Defendant.

United States District Court D. Colorado.

December 21, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tweedy, Mosley, Aley & Young, Denver, Colo., for plaintiffs in Civil Actions Nos. 8680 and 9202, Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, New York City, of counsel.

Fred M. Winner, Denver, Colo., of counsel, in Civil Action No. 8680.

Edward N. Juhan, Fred M. Winner, William S. Livingston, Denver, Colo., for plaintiffs in Civil Action No. 8685.

Schmidt & Van Cise, Richard L. Eason, Denver, Colo., for plaintiffs in Civil Action No. 8691.

Lawrence M. Henry, U. S. Atty. for Dist. of Colorado, David I. Shedroff, Asst. U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo., Thomas L. McKevitt, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant, Robert W. Mesch, and Lowell Madsen, Attys., Office of Regional Sol., Dept. of Interior, Denver, Colo., of counsel.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, District Judge.

The four above-named actions arise under the Constitution and laws of the United States. Plaintiffs in all four actions seek an adjudication that certain decisions of the Department of the Interior, hereinafter the Department, regarding oil shale placer mining claims in Colorado are erroneous, invalid and without force and effect. Plaintiffs in Civil Action Nos. 8685, 8691 and 9202 seek mandatory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases