1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 253 F.Supp.
  5. 253 F.Supp. 941 (1966)
 

SPENCER v. BRENNER

Civ. A. No. 2328-65.

253 F.Supp. 941 (1966)

Francis T. SPENCER, Plaintiff, v. Edward J. BRENNER, Commissioner of Patents, Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

March 28, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James W. Dent, Washington, D. C., Richard F. Walker, Roberts, Cushman & Grover, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Joseph Schimmel, Sol., Lutrelle F. Parker, Washington, D. C., of counsel, for defendant.

JACKSON, District Judge.

This cause came on for trial March 2, 1966, at the conclusion of which the Court found for the defendant and against plaintiff, who failed to prove that the decisions of the Patent Office tribunals were either clearly erroneous or lacked a rational basis. Pursuant to Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P., the Court now makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. This civil action was brought by plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases