1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 270 F.Supp.
  5. 270 F.Supp. 841 (1966)
 

EMSIG MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. MERIT PLASTICS

No. 61 C 411.

270 F.Supp. 841 (1966)

EMSIG MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MERIT PLASTICS, Brofman Machinery Corp., and Jules Friedman, Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

August 24, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Spille, Mark T. Basseches, and John A. Mitchell, New York City (Curtis, Morris & Safford, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

John T. Kelton, New York City, and Jerome Bauer, Mineola (Watson, Leavenworth, Kelton & Taggart, New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

DOOLING, District Judge.

Plaintiff has sued for infringement of its patent (Dangelmajer, U. S. Patent No. 2,643,983) on a composition of matter useful in compression molding of buttons and other articles in which a "mother-of-pearl" appearance of light reflected from depth ("integral sheen") is desired. It has been concluded that plaintiff's patent is invalid and that defendants' practice did not infringe. Separate findings of fact and conclusions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases