1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 255 F.Supp.
  5. 255 F.Supp. 841 (1966)
 

UNITED STATES v. ARMCO STEEL CORPORATION

No. 35326-Cr.

255 F.Supp. 841 (1966)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ARMCO STEEL CORPORATION, Dover Corporation, Dresser Industries, Inc., Walter O'Bannon Company, United States Steel Corporation, and the Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

February 14, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Draper W. Phillips, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Los Angeles, Cal., and John J. Schimmenti and Rudolph Pearl, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Breed, Abbott & Morgan, by Robert A. Bicks, David S. Patterson, and Curtis W. Enyeart, New York City, and Flint & Mackay, by John C. Argue, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant Armco Steel Corporation.

Latham & Watkins, by Philip F. Belleville, Los Angeles, Cal., and Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle, by Winslow M. Lovejoy, Jr., New York City, for defendants Dover Corporation and Walter O'Bannon Co.

McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, by Philip K. Verleger and Jack D. Fudge, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant Dresser Industries, Inc.

Musick, Peeler & Garrett, by Jesse R. O'Malley and Donald R. Gail, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant United States Steel Corporation.

Adams, Duque & Hazeltine, Los Angeles, Cal., by Lawrence T. Lydick, Los Angeles, Cal., and J. F. Wagenhauser, General Counsel Continental-Emsco Co., Dallas, Tex., for defendant Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co.

HALL, District Judge.

The indictment was filed in this case on September 28, 1965. After an order severing the trial—there were two counts —and setting the trial as to Count 2 before the trial of Count 1, the defendants filed a motion for a bill of particulars with nine paragraphs divided into 31 subparagraphs, all of which were granted except paragraph 7, which contained three subparagraphs, which was denied without prejudice to its renewal.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases