1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 263 F.Supp.
  5. 263 F.Supp. 774 (1966)
 

WILLEMS v. BARCLAYS BANK D. C. O.

No. 65 Civ. 3392.

263 F.Supp. 774 (1966)

Edward J. WILLEMS and Pan American Industries, Inc., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BARCLAYS BANK D. C. O., Clifton Low-N-Chee, John Carter, William G. Stoll, Builders Guayana Ltd., "John Doe" and "Richard Roe," the last two names being fictitious, persons intended being those in conspiracy with the above named defendants, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

December 30, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seymour Launer, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Schlesinger & Berliner, New York City, for defendant Barclays Bank D. C. O.; Ephraim Berliner, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

COOPER, District Judge.

Defendant Barclay's Bank moves to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint. Motion granted.

Defendant contests this Court's jurisdiction, asserting a lack of diversity. We find that there is jurisdiction.

Plaintiff Willems is a New York citizen, while plaintiff Pan-American Industries is a Delaware corporation. Defendant Bank is a British corporation.

The diversity statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 provides in pertinent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases