1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 45 N.J.
  5. 45 N.J. 54 (1965)
 

RICCIARDI v. DAMAR PRODUCTS CO.

45 N.J. 54 (1965)

211 A.2d 347

JOSEPH RICCIARDI, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. DAMAR PRODUCTS COMPANY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 14, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Norman Peterkin argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Friedman & D'Alessandro, attorneys).

Mr. Herman D. Michels argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Roger L. Toner, on the brief; Messrs. Toner, Crowley, Woelper & Vanderbilt, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by WEINTRAUB, C.J.

Petitioner seeks an award under the workmen's compensation law by reason of the death of his wife. He prevailed in the Division of Workmen's Compensation, but the County Court reversed upon a finding that petitioner was not a dependent of the decedent. The Appellate Division affirmed the County Court, finding both (1) that the accident did not occur in the course of employment and (2) that there was no dependency...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases