1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 242 F.Supp.
  5. 242 F.Supp. 670 (1965)
 

GLICKMAN v. SCHWEICKART & CO.

242 F.Supp. 670 (1965)

Alice GLICKMAN, Plaintiff, v. SCHWEICKART & CO., Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 22, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Korotkin & Oppenheim, New York City, for plaintiff, Michael Paul Korotkin, New York City, of counsel.

Brown, Wood, Fuller, Caldwell & Ivey, New York City, for defendant, Richard Conway Casey, New York City, of counsel.

HERLANDS, District Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss made by defendant under Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff's amended complaint contains the following relevant allegations, the truth of which must be assumed arguendo for purposes of this motion to dismiss.

Count I

Defendant is a securities broker and dealer, who has registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to the Securities...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases