1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 140 S.E.2d
  5. 140 S.E.2d 759 (1965)
 

ARRINGTON v. STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP.

No. 203.

140 S.E.2d 759 (1965)

264 N.C. 38

Prince ARRINGTON, Jr., Employee, v. STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Employer, and Royal Indemnity Company, Carrier.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allsbrook, Benton & Knott, Roanoke Rapids, for plaintiff.

Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter and Stephen Millikin, Greensboro, for defendants.

MOORE, Justice.

Plaintiff's argument for reversal of the superior court judgment is but an elaboration of the reasoning, conclusions and findings contained in the following excerpts from the opinion and award of the Full Commission:

"Over the years the Commission has awarded compensation for disfigurements for loss of internal organs or loss of use of said organs when the outward observable blemish or mark was negligible or almost non-existent. Awards have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases