1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 238 F.Supp.
  5. 238 F.Supp. 648 (1965)
 

BLUMCRAFT OF PITTSBURGH v. LADD

Civ. A. No. 696-63.

238 F.Supp. 648 (1965)

BLUMCRAFT OF PITTSBURGH, a Partnership Consisting of Hyman Blum, Max Blum, Louis Blum, and Harry P. Blum, Plaintiff, v. David L. LADD, Commissioner of Patents, Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

March 1, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Smith, Washington, D. C., James C. McConnon, Paul & Paul, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Clarence W. Moore, Sol., Washington, D. C., for defendant.

JACKSON, District Judge.

This is a civil action under 35 U.S.C. § 145 against the Commissioner of Patents seeking judgment authorizing the Commissioner to issue a patent on an application (Design Serial No. 54,864) filed March 5, 1959, by the plaintiff.

The application relates to the design of a single railing post. A companion application (Design Serial No. 54,387) was also filed by the plaintiff on January 12, 1959. It was directed to a railing design...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases