1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 240 F.Supp.
  5. 240 F.Supp. 640 (1965)
 

KIERULFF ASSOCIATES v. LURIA BROTHERS & COMPANY

240 F.Supp. 640 (1965)

KIERULFF ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, v. LURIA BROTHERS & COMPANY, Inc., and Lipsett Steel Products, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

March 3, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Calimafde, Paul H. Blaustein, Hopgood & Calimafde, New York City, for plaintiff.

Brumbaugh, Free, Graves & Donohue, New York City, for defendant Luria Brothers & Co., Inc.; Frederick C. Carver, New York City, of counsel.

LEVET, District Judge.

The defendant, Luria Brothers & Company, Inc. (hereinafter "Luria") asks the court to dismiss this action for patent infringement against it on the ground that the statutory venue requirements are not satisfied in the Southern District of New York.

Venue in a patent infringement suit is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) (1958):

"Any civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district where the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases