NAGEL v. HAMMOND

No. 9616.

408 P.2d 468 (1965)

Clarence E. NAGEL, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Marion HAMMOND and Marion Hammond, Guardian ad litem for Jack Hammond, a minor, Defendants-Appellants. Marion HAMMOND and Marion Hammond, Guardian ad litem for Jack Hammond, a minor, Cross-Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants-Appellants, v. Clarence E. NAGEL and Swift and Company, Cross-Defendants and Counter-Claimants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

Rehearing Denied December 21, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elam, Burke, Jeppesen & Evans, Boise, for appellants.

Smith & Miller, Caldwell, Hawley, Troxell, Ennis & Hawley, Boise, for respondents.


KNUDSON, Justice.

The damages sought by plaintiff-respondent, Clarence E. Nagel, resulted from a collision which occurred at the intersection of 4th and Blaine Streets, in Caldwell, Idaho, at about 2:30 p. m. on July 11, 1963. The plaintiff was at that time an employee of counterclaimant, Swift and Company, and was driving his employer's truck south on 4th Street when it collided with an automobile being driven by defendant, Jack Hammond, who was driving east on Blaine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases