1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 239 Or.
  5. 239 Or. 634 (1965)
 

BOOTH v. NIRSHEL

239 Or. 634 (1965)

399 P.2d 364

BOOTH v. NIRSHEL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed February 24, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald R. Pullen, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief was Robert P. Jones, and Hershiser, McMenamin, Blyth & Jones.

Walter H. Sweek, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Vergeer & Samuels and Thomas A. Cavanaugh.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and SLOAN, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.

REVERSED.

LUSK, J.

Plaintiff was a seasonal employee of the defendant at his mink farm during December 1960. About December sixth she accidentally injured her right thumb and wrist while engaged in stretching a mink pelt over a frame. Defendant was insured by United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company under a policy by which the company agreed to pay to defendant's employees who should be accidentally injured in the course of their employment compensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases