PER CURIAM:
The appellant, who tried to pawn a new suit of clothes that did not fit him, which was identified as one of those stolen the night before from a tailor shop, and, when asked, gave two explanations before his arrest and a third after he was taken to the police station as to his possession of the suit, contends on appeal that the evidence was legally insufficient to convict him of breaking into a shop and stealing goods to the value of $5 and upwards in...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.