WENZEL v. DANBURY


152 Conn. 675 (1965)

WILLIAM W. WENZEL ET AL. v. THE TOWN OF DANBURY ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided June 22, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Cohen, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

H. LeRoy Jackson, for the appellees (defendants), with whom were Charles A. Hallock, for the appellees (named defendant and defendant Sauer), and Morton I. Riefberg, for the appellees (defendant city of Danbury and defendant Bowman).

KING, C. J., MURPHY, ALCORN, COMLEY and HOUSE, JS.


COMLEY, J.

The plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the portion of the Home Rule Act (General Statutes, c. 99), which provides for the adoption of consolidation ordinances, and they also attack the validity of such an ordinance alleged to have been illegally adopted by the town and city of Danbury under General Statutes §§ 7-195 and 7-197.

There are four plaintiffs. One sues as a resident, elector and taxpayer of the town; another, as a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases