1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 243 F.Supp.
  5. 243 F.Supp. 447 (1965)
 

HAMM v. BRENNER

Civ. A. No. 1060-64.

243 F.Supp. 447 (1965)

Franklin A. HAMM, Richard L. Weiher, and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Plaintiffs, v. Edward J. BRENNER, Commissioner of Patents, Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

July 1, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ellsworth H. Mosher, Washington, D. C., Cruzan Alexander, James A. Smith, Carpenter, Abbott, Coulter & Kinney, St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiffs.

Clarence W. Moore, Sol., U. S. Patent Office, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

JACKSON, District Judge.

This action came on for trial on February 18, 1965. Upon due consideration of the evidence presented, together with the briefs counsel were accorded an opportunity to file, the Court has found in favor of the defendant and will order that the Complaint be dismissed.

Pursuant to Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court states its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law separately as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases