1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 246 F.Supp.
  5. 246 F.Supp. 435 (1965)
 

SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. SOUTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY DEPT.

Civ. A. No. AC-1614.

246 F.Supp. 435 (1965)

SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SOUTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, City of Aiken, and Sherman Converse, Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. South Carolina, Aiken Division.

October 20, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward C. Cushman, Jr., Henderson, Salley, Cushman & Summerall, Aiken, S. C., for plaintiff.

Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., by J. McNary Spigner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbia, S. C., Dorcey Lybrand, Lybrand, Rich & Cain, Aiken, S. C., for S. C. State Hwy. Dept.

Henry Busbee, Aiken, S. C., for City of Aiken.

Arthur D. Rich, Lybrand, Rich & Cain, Aiken, S. C., for Sherman Converse.

SIMONS, District Judge.

This is a suit commenced by the plaintiff herein, a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Virginia which does not have its principal place of business in the State of South Carolina, against the defendant South Carolina State Highway Department, a Department and agency of the State of South Carolina, the defendant City of Aiken, a municipal corporation created and existing under the laws of the State of South Carolina, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases