1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 88 N.J.
  5. 88 N.J. Super. 552 (1965)
 

BURPEE v. PRINCETON MUN. IMP. CO.

88 N.J. Super. 552 (1965)

213 A.2d 22

STERLING BURPEE, SR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. PRINCETON MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 25, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Leonard J. Felzenberg argued the cause for petitioner-appellant (Messrs. Roskein, Kronisch & Felzenberg, attorneys).

Mr. Samuel A. Bloom argued the cause for defendant-respondent.

Before Judges GAULKIN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, S.J.A.D.

Burpee was awarded workmen's compensation, but he appeals (1) the setting of the compensation rate at $26 per week, (2) the ruling that the statute does not permit the allowance of a fee to his attorney for the services rendered in the Division, and (3) the method fixed by the County Court by which Princeton Municipal Improvement Company, the employer, is to reimburse him for attorney's fees which he paid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases