1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 353 F.2d
  5. 353 F.2d 284 (1965)
 

GROSSMAN v. PEARLMAN

No. 163, Docket 30054.

353 F.2d 284 (1965)

Irma GROSSMAN and David Grossman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bernard PEARLMAN, Alan Krumholz and Morris F. Pearlman, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided December 2, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irma Grossman and David Grossman, pro se.

Arthur Stoll, New York City, for defendant-appellee Morris F. Pearlman.

Before MEDINA, WATERMAN and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.

MEDINA, Circuit Judge:

There are before us two appeals that have been consolidated for the purpose of argument. On both appeals we have heard oral argument by each of the plaintiffs-appellants appearing pro se. The first appeal is from an order of Judge Bonsal quashing service of process made on defendant-appellee Morris F. Pearlman. The second appeal is from an order of Judge Wyatt denying a motion, purportedly made pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases