1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 45 N.J.
  5. 45 N.J. 540 (1965)
 

STATE v. PEETROS

45 N.J. 540 (1965)

214 A.2d 2

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JAMES PEETROS AND CHARLES THOMAS KOSKINAS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 25, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Norman Heine, Camden County Prosecutor, argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Anthony M. Bezich, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief).

Mr. Benjamin Asbell argued the cause for defendant-respondent James Peetros.

Mr. Joseph T. Sherman argued the cause for defendant-respondent Charles Thomas Koskinas.

The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

Defendants, James Peetros and Charles Thomas Koskinas, were convicted of armed robbery. On appeal, in an unreported opinion, the Appellate Division reversed as to Peetros holding that the failure of the trial judge to instruct the jury on alibi was plain error and as to Koskinas, holding that certain cross-examination of him by the State regarding a crime involving firearms with which he had been charged but...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases