1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 45 N.J.
  5. 45 N.J. 533 (1965)
 

BATISTICH v. BRENNAN

45 N.J. 533 (1965)

213 A.2d 761

ANDREW F. BATISTICH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MARTIN BRENNAN, CLERK OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND LOUIS DePASCALE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND EDWARD J. BORRONE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 4, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Isadore Glauberman argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. John J. Sheehy, attorney).

Mr. Joseph A. Davis argued the cause for the respondent.

Mr. Alan B. Handler argued the cause amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court held that L. 1956, c. 24 (N.J.S.A. 40:69A-161.1) was invalid because it was not enacted in accordance with the constitutional command relating to the enactment of a special or local law regulating the internal affairs of municipalities. Art. IV, sec. VII, pars. 7, 8, 9 and 10. The Appellate Division agreed, 88 N.J.Super. 84 (1965), and the appeal from its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases