ALDRIDGE v. SAXEY


242 Or. 238 (1965)

409 P.2d 184

ALDRIDGE ET UX v. SAXEY ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed December 22, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gunther F. Krause, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Fredric R. Merrill and Krause, Lindsay & Nahstoll.

William F. Bernard, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Bernard, Bernard & Hurley.

Before PERRY, Presiding Justice, and GOODWIN, DENECKE, HOLMAN and LUSK, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

LUSK, J.

This is a suit to enjoin the defendants from keeping and maintaining on their property a large number of German Shepherd dogs in violation, as alleged, of restrictive covenants in a deed and as constituting a nuisance. The trial court entered a decree dismissing the suit and plaintiffs have appealed.

Plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Abner F. Aldridge, were formerly owners of a tract of land comprising 70 acres in Clackamas County, Oregon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases