1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 252 F.Supp.
  5. 252 F.Supp. 215 (1965)
 

STOCKWELL v. REYNOLDS & CO.

252 F.Supp. 215 (1965)

Vernon A. STOCKWELL, Plaintiff, v. REYNOLDS & CO. and Ralph E. Carpenter, Defendants. James ARNEIL, Plaintiff, v. REYNOLDS & CO. and Ralph E. Carpenter, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

September 22, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Webster, Sheffield, Fleischmann, Hitchcock & Chrystie, New York City, for plaintiffs; Donald J. Cohn, Henry B. Cortesi, New York City, of counsel.

Townsend & Lewis, New York City, for defendants; Richard J. Cutler, Michael A. Berch, New York City, of counsel.

BONSAL, District Judge.

Defendants in the above actions have moved, pursuant to Rule 12(b) (1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for orders dismissing the complaints for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and have moved for other relief. Since both motions involve the same questions, they are treated together.

The plaintiffs in each action are citizens of the State of Washington. The defendants in each action are, Reynolds & Co., a New York partnership...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases