1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 44 N.J.
  5. 44 N.J. 390 (1965)
 

STATE v. BOYD

44 N.J. 390 (1965)

209 A.2d 134

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DAVID BOYD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 19, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas M. Maher argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Carlos Peay, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Ronald J. Picinich, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief; Mr. Guy W. Calissi, Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of knowingly possessing lottery slips in violation of N.J.S. 2A:121-3. The conviction was affirmed in the Appellate Division in an unreported opinion. An appeal was taken then directly to this Court under R.R. 1:2-1 (a).

The appeal to this Court without the grant of certification is based upon the contention that a question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases