1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 376 Mich.
  5. 376 Mich. 41 (1965)
 

HUSTED v. CONSUMERS POWER CO.

Calendar Nos. 10, 11, Docket Nos. 50,772, 50,773.

376 Mich. 41 (1965)

135 N.W.2d 370

HUSTED v. CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY. CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY v. HERTEL-DEYO COMPANY.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided June 7, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cicinelli, Mossner, Majoros & Harrigan and Baker & Baker, for plaintiffs Husted.

Smith, Brooker & Harvey (Carl H. Smith, Sr., of counsel), and J.M. Smith, for third-party plaintiff Consumers Power Company.

McDonald, Anderson & Dykema (David W. Swets, of counsel), for third-party defendant Hertel-Deyo Company.

PER CURIAM:

One of our new rules of court is headed "Third-Party Practice." It is cited properly as GCR 1963, 204. Under its auspices appellant Hertel-Deyo, employer of plaintiff Claude A. Husted up to the time of sustenance by the latter of personal injuries upon which he declares, was drawn ex parte into these consolidated Midland county lawsuits Hertel-Deyo moved promptly for summary dismissal of the primary defendant's third-party complaints and, upon leave...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases