1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 86 N.J.
  5. 86 N.J. Super. 323 (1965)
 

ARDIS v. REED

86 N.J. Super. 323 (1965)

206 A.2d 890

MICHAEL ARDIS AND DANIEL EILE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CARLTON THOMAS REED, A/K/A CARLTON REED, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 25, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Howard A. Goldberger argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Goldberger, Ostrow, Seigel & Finn, attorneys).

Mr. George P. Moser, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Moser, Roveto & McGough, attorneys).

Before Judges GAULKIN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by COLLESTER, J.A.D.

In this automobile negligence action plaintiffs Eile and Ardis appeal from a judgment of the Bergen County District Court following a jury verdict of no cause for action in favor of defendant Reed. Plaintiffs' motion for a new trial was denied. They contend: (1) the verdict was against the weight of the evidence; (2) the trial court erred in its charge to the jury; (3) the trial court erred in denying plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases