1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 88 N.J.
  5. 88 N.J. Super. 315 (1965)
 

DEPT. OF CONS. AND ECO. DEV. v. SCIPIO

88 N.J. Super. 315 (1965)

212 A.2d 184

DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, DIVISION OF FISH AND GAME, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL SCIPIO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 29, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard F. Aronsohn, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant, cross-respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Messrs. Richard H. Steinberg and Barry R. Mandelbaum argued the cause for respondent, cross-appellant (Messrs. Irving & Barry R. Mandelbaum, attorneys).

Before Judges KILKENNY, GOLDMANN and LEWIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KILKENNY, J.A.D.

Defendant was convicted in the Fairfield Municipal Court of violating N.J.S.A. 23:4-13, possession of an illegal missile, and N.J.S.A. 23:10-5, resisting arrest. On defendant's appeal to the Essex County Court, there was a plenary trial de novo. The conviction for resisting arrest was affirmed, but the conviction for possession of an illegal missile was reversed. The Division of Fish and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases