BROOKHART v. HASKINS

No. 39132

2 Ohio St. 2d 36 (1965)

BROOKHART v. HASKINS, SUPT., LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 31, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James Brookhart, in propria persona.

Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, and Mr. William C. Baird, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

It is petitioner's contention that he was not tried upon an indictment returned by a grand jury but rather upon one returned by the prosecutor. During the course of the trial, upon motion by the prosecutor, the court permitted the indictment to be amended to conform to the evidence. These amendments consisted of corrections of the check numbers and the amounts on two of the checks set forth in the indictment and also the correction of the name of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases